WELCOME TO GREATER ISRAEL!


! Bienvenidos al Gran  Israel!
The tail will be wagging the dog under Donald Trump

La cola estará dando órdenes al perro en el gobierno de Donald Trump

Por/By: Philip Giraldi

December 28, 2016 “Information Clearing House” – “Unz Review” – While the presidential campaign was still in progress it was possible to think that there might be some positive change in America’s broken foreign policy. Hillary Clinton was clearly the candidate of Washington Establishment mawkishness’, while Donald Trump was declaring his disinclination for democracy and nation building overseas as well as promoting détente with Russia. Those of us who considered the foreign policy debacle to be the most dangerous issue confronting the country, particularly as it was also fueling domestic tyranny, tended to vote on the basis of that one issue in favor of Trump.

Mientras que la campaña presidencial estaba en curso todavía era posible pensar que podrían haber algunos cambios positivos en política exterior rota de Estados Unidos. Hillary Clinton era claramente la candidata preferida del establecimiento guerrerista de Washington, mientras que Donald Trump estaba declarando su aversión por la democracia y rediseño de gobiernos en el extranjero así como la promoción la distensión con Rusia. Los que considerábamos  la debacle de la política exterior como la cuestión más peligrosa que enfrentaba el país, especialmente porque también estaba alimentando  la tiranía doméstica, tendíamos a votar por Trump  basándonos en esa una cuestión.

On December 1st in Cincinnati, president-elect Donald Trump made some interesting comments about his post-electoral foreign policy plans. There were a lot of good things in it, including his citing of $6 trillion “wasted” in Mideast fights when “our goal is stability not chaos.” And as for dealing with real enemies, he promised to “partner with any nation that is willing to join us in the effort to defeat ISIS and radical Islamic terrorism…” He called it a “new foreign policy that finally learns from the mistakes of the past” adding that “We will stop looking to topple regimes and overthrow governments, folks.”

El primero de diciembre en Cincinnati, Donald Trump hizo algunos comentarios interesantes acerca de sus planes de política exterior después de la elección. Había un montón de cosas buenas en él, incluyendo su mención de los  $ 6 billones “desperdiciados” en las guerras del Medio Oriente cuando “nuestro objetivo es estabilidad y no el caos”. Y al tratar con  enemigos reales  prometió “asociarse con cualquier nación que estuviera dispuesta a unirse a nosotros en el esfuerzo para derrotar a ISIS y el terrorismo islámico radical…” El la llamó una “nueva política exterior que finalmente aprende de los errores del pasado” agregando que “Amigos, vamos a dejar de tumbar regímenes y derrocar gobiernos.”

Regarding the apparent inability of governments to thoroughly check out new immigrants prior to letting them inside the country, demonstrated most recently in Nice, Ohio and Berlin, Trump described how “People are pouring in from regions of the Middle East — we have no idea who they are, where they come from what they are thinking and we are going to stop that dead cold. … These are stupid refugee programs created by stupid politicians.” Exaggerated? For sure, but he has a point, and it all is part and parcel of a foreign policy that serves no actual interest for people who already live in the United States.

Con respecto a la aparente incapacidad de los gobiernos para examinar bien a los nuevos inmigrantes antes de dejarlos dentro al país, demostrado recientemente en Niza, Ohio y Berlín, Trump describió cómo “personas están viniendo de regiones del Medio Oriente, no sabemos quienes son, de donde vienen, que están pensando y vamos a poner un alto a eso. … Estos son programas de refugiados estúpido creados por los políticos estúpidos”. ¿Exagerado? Por supuesto, pero el tiene un punto, y todo es parte integral de una política exterior que no sirve a los intereses reales de las personas que ya viven en Estados Unidos.

But, as so often with Trump, there was also the flip side. On the looney fringe of the foreign and national security policy agenda, the president-elect oddly believes that “The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes.” So to reduce the number of nukes we have to create more of them and put them in more places. Pouring gasoline on a raging fire would be an appropriate analogy and it certainly leads to questions regarding who is advising The Donald with this kind of nonsense.

Pero, como es tan frecuente con Trump, y también hubo un cambio de parecer. En el margen loco de la agenda de política exterior y seguridad nacional, el Presidente electo extrañamente cree que “Estados Unidos debe  fortalecer y ampliar su capacidad nuclear hasta que el el mundo entre en razón respecto a las armas nucleares.” Así que para reducir el número de armas nucleares  tenemos que crear más de ellas y ponerlas en mas lugares. Arrojar gasolina a un incendio enardecido sería una analogía apropiada y ciertamente lleva a preguntarnos quién está asesorando al Donald con este tipo de tonterías.

Trump has promised to “put America first,” but there is inevitably a spanner in the works. Now, with the New Year only six days away and the presidential inauguration coming less than three weeks after that, it is possible to discern that the new foreign policy will, more than under Barack Obama and George W. Bush, be driven in significant part by Israeli interests.

Trump ha prometido poner “poner los intereses de EEUU primero que los de otros”, pero inevitablemente hay una llave en el asunto. Ahora, con el nuevo año sólo a seis días de distancia y la inauguración presidencial a menos de tres semanas, es posible discernir que la nueva política exterior, más que la de Barack Obama y George W. Bush, se impulsará en gran parte por los intereses israelíes.

At least Obama had the good sense to despise Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but that will not be true of the White House after January 20th. Trump’s very first telephone conversation with a foreign head of government after being elected was with Netanyahu and during the campaign, he promised to invite Bibi to the White House immediately after the inauguration. The new president’s first naming of an Ambassador-designate to a foreign nation was of his good friend and bankruptcy lawyer David Friedman to Israel. Friedman had headed Trump’s Israel Advisory Committee and is a notable hard liner who supports the Israeli settler movement, an extreme right-wing political entity that is nominally opposed by existing U.S. government policy as both illegal and damaging to Washington’s interests. Beyond that, Friedman rejects creation of a Palestinian state and supports Israel’s actual annexation of the West Bank.

Al menos Obama tuvo el buen sentido de despreciar al primer ministro israelí Benjamin Netanyahu, pero esto no va a ocurrir en la Casa Blanca después del 20 de enero. La primer llamada telefónica que hizoTrump con un jefe de gobierno extranjero después de ser elegido fue Netanyahu y durante la campaña prometió invitar a Bibi a la Casa Blanca inmediatamente después de la inauguración. El primer nombramiento de un embajador  a una nación extranjera fue designar a su buen amigo y abogado en cuestiones de bancarrota David Friedman a Israel. Friedman había encabezado el Comité Asesor sobre Israel de Trump  y mantiene una linea dura en su apoyo el movimiento colononial israelí, una entidad política derechista que es nominalmente  opuesta por la actual política del gobierno de Estados Unidos por considerarla ilegal y perjudicial para los intereses de Washington. Más allá de eso, Friedman rechaza la creación de un Estado palestino y apoya la anexión de Israel de Cisjordania.

U.S. Ambassadors are supposed to support American interests but Friedman would actually be representing and endorsing a particularly noxious version of Israeli fascism as the new normal in the relationship with Washington. Friedman describes Jerusalem as “the holy capital of the Jewish people and only the Jewish people.” Trump is already taking steps to move the U.S. Embassy there, making the American government unique in having its chief diplomatic mission in the legally disputed city. The move will also serve as a recruiting poster for groups like ISIS and will inflame opinion against the U.S. among friendly Arab states in the region. There is no possible gain and much to lose for the United States and for American citizens in making the move, but it satisfies Israeli hardliners and zealots like Friedman.

Se supone que los eembajadores de Estados Unidos deben apoyar los intereses estadounidenses pero Friedman de hecho estará  representando y apoyando una versión particularmente nociva del fascismo israelí como la nueva norma en su relación con Washington. Friedman describe Jerusalén como “la capital sagrada del pueblo judío y sólo el pueblo judío”. Trump ya está tomando medidas para llevar allí la Embajada de Estados Unidos, lo que hace que el gobierno norteamericano sea único al tener su principal  misión diplomática en la ciudad disputada legalmente. La medida también servirá como un centro de reclutamiento para grupos como ISIS y calentara los animos  en contra de los Estados Unidos entre los Estados árabes amigos de la región. La acción no representa ninguna posible ganancia y mucho que perder para los Estados Unidos y para los ciudadanos estadounidenses, pero satisface a los israelíes radicales y fanáticos como Friedman.

SOURCE:http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46120.htm

 

Anuncios

EL SUR EN EL NORTE SABADO 31 DIC 2016

ESCUCHAR EL RESUMEN SEMANAL DE NOTICIAS AQUI:

(*) Millonarios donantes de la campaña presidencial de Donald Trump están siendo considerados para puestos de su gobierno.

(*) Reportan que mas de medio millón de residentes del área de la capital estadounidense padecen hambre.

(*) La Unión Americana figura de nuevo como el mayor vendedor de armamentos en el mundo.

(*) Rusia declara que no expulsara personal diplomático norteamericano como hiciera Washington porque no quiere hacer diplomacia de cocina.

(*) El portal digital The Intercept reporta que la administración de Barack Obama ha sido una de las que mas ha protegido a Israel y que menos ha presionado a Tel Aviv para avanzar la causa Palestina.

(*) En Guatemala, denuncian falta de cumplimiento de los acuerdos de paz respecto a los derechos de las mujeres.

(*) En México, protestan por el alto precio de los combustibles y convocan a no pagar impuestos para presionar al presidente Enrique Peña Nieto.

(*) Congresistas en Colombia piden al presidente Juan Manuel Santos que reconsidere su intención de unirse a la alianza del tratado del atlántico norte, la OTAN

(*) Las madres y padres de los normalistas desaparecidos en México denuncian un trato humillante en la Basílica de Guadalupe cuando llegaron a conmemorar 27 meses de la desaparición de sus hijos.

(*) En El Salvador hacen preparativos para conmemorar el 25 aniversario de la firma de los acuerdos de paz.

(*) Indignación mundial causa la sentencia en Argentina de Milagro Sala, diputada del Parlamento del Sur.

(*) Dos activistas vascos fueron arrestados en Grecia cuando intentaban transportar a ocho refugiados.

INFORMATIVO PACIFICA VIERNES 30 DIC 2016

ESCUCHAR EL NOTICIERO AQUI:

(*)El pueblo palestino sufre en el  2016 el mayor número de demoliciones de sus viviendas

(*) México ocupa  el tercer lugar del mundo por el  asesinato de periodistas

(*) En el marco del 23 aniversario del levantamiento zapatista el Consejo Nacional Indígena elegirá a una mujer de los pueblos originarios como su candidata presidencial del 2018.

(*) El presidente ruso Vladimir Putin declara que el no va expulsar a ningún diplomático estadounidense como respuesta a las nuevas sanciones impuestas por EEUU. 

(*) La actriz y cineasta Boliviana Carla Ortiz revela en los ochos meses que recorrio territorio Sirio noto que  en la prensa occidental existe una gran desinformacion sobre ese pais.  Aniade que en el pais arabe nadie parece conocer a los llamados “Cascos Blancos,” entidad elevada a icono mundial en la prensa internacional.

INFORMATIVO PACIFICA JUEVES 29 DIC 2016

ESCUCHAR EL NOTICIERO AQUI:

(*) En México convocan a una protesta nacional contra el aumento a los combustibles y por la renuncia de EPN

(*) Inicia en Siria el día 30 el silencio de las armas entre grupos rebeldes y el gobierno de Bashar al Assad.

(*) Causa indignación la condena en Argentina de 3 años de prisión a la líder indígena Milagro Sala.

(*) En Europa detienen a dos activistas que intentaban trasportar a un grupo de refugiados como acto de protesta.

(*) EEUU expulsa diplomáticos rusos e impone nuevas sanciones contra la federación Rusa.

(*) Salvadoreños  se preparan para la conmemoración del 25 aniversario de la firma de los Tratados de Paz.

IT WAS A LEAK AND I KNOW WHO DID IT,SAYS CRAIG MURRAY

“I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things, ” Says Craig Murray, former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan.

============================================

CIA’s Russia Hacking Claims Dismissed as ‘Bulls***’ Former UK Ambassador

‘I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack’

By Belfast Telegraph

December 15, 2016 “Information Clearing House” – “Belfast Telegraph” –  Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange, has dismissed the CIA’s claims that Russia interfered in last month’s presidential election as “bulls***”.

On Friday the Washington Post reported on a secret assessment by the CIA, which concluded that Russian intelligence hacked the Democratic National Committee’s servers and that of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta, specifically to help Trump win the presidency.

Mr Murray said: “I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

“If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIA’s statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States.

“America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever.”

The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations while Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia.

The claims also drew a rebuke from Trump’s transition team, which said in a statement: “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”

Meanwhile US President-elect Donald Trump called the CIA’s assessment “ridiculous”.

“Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!” Trump tweeted on Monday morning.

Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2016

Mr Trump rejected the CIA’s conclusion that Russia tried to interfere with the presidential election and blamed “very embarrassed” Democrats for the public release of the assessment. The Washington Post first reported the CIA finding on Friday.

“It’s ridiculous,” Mr Trump said of the CIA’s assessment. He added, however, that he does not necessarily oppose President Barack Obama’s order for a review of campaign-season hacking. “If you’re going to do that, I think you should not just say ‘Russia’. You should say other countries also, and maybe other individuals.”

The White House has said the probe would focus on any breaches by other countries, and past elections.

SOURCE: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46043.htm

=-================================

PHILADELPHIA ― Intelligence officials are shocked that Russia appears to be meddling in the U.S. presidential election, but for some supporters of Bernie Sanders, it’s just turnabout.

Lakewood, Colorado, delegate Kim Netherton said it’s beside the point whether agents of Russian President Vladimir Putin hacked the Democratic National Committee’s emails, as reported this month. And it may come with a little poetic justice for Hillary Clinton, according to Netherton.

“Isn’t it interesting that her campaign is now experiencing the same thing that she perpetrated on other countries,” Netherton told The Huffington Post, as she awaited Sanders’ speech Monday night.

“She did this in Haiti, she did this in Honduras, and now it’s coming back on her and she’s all verklempt about it,” Netherton added. “It’s a little bit of her own medicine, but unfortunately I don’t think she’s open minded enough to see that for what it is.”

Guatemala

In 1954, the Central Intelligence Agency deposed Guatemalan president Jacobo Arbenz.

It installed a military dictatorship that would be more amenable to fighting communism and protecting the United Fruit Company ― to which brothers Allen and John Foster Dulles, CIA director and secretary of state, respectively, were closely tied. Che Guevara, the Marxist revolutionary, was in Guatemala at the time. He would later tell Cuban leader Fidel Castro that it was Guatemala’s free and open society that allowed the CIA to penetrate and overthrow Arbenz. Castro should go the opposite direction if he wanted to stay in power, Guevara said. He took Guevara’s advice and was able to fend off endless CIA assassination and overthrow attempts. The collateral damage was freedom in Cuba.

Iran

When Iran elected a nationalist politician, Mohammed Mosaddeq,

the U.S. intervened to launch a coup in 1953, which CIA agent Kermit Roosevelt led. Mossadegh’s crime was to nationalize a British oil company, a forerunner to BP, and to spark concerns among the paranoid Dulles brothers that he was leaning toward the Soviet Union

Congo

Malcolm X once called Congolese independence leader Patrice Lumumba

“thegreatest black man who ever walked the African continent.” Lumumba led an anti-colonial campaign to oust the ruling Belgians from the Congo and he became the country’s first elected leader. The U.S. set about almost immediately to overthrow and assassinate him, perceiving Lumumba (incorrectly, it turned out) to be a pawn of the Soviet Union

Indonesia

Another leader who resisted being pulled into the U.S.-Soviet Cold War was Sukarno of Indonesia.

When the Communist Party finished fourth in an Indonesian election and Sukarno offered them proportional representation in his government, the U.S. panicked and secretly supported the brutal purging of suspected communists. Thousands died and the military emerged the most powerful institution in the country.

Vietnam

When the French withdrew from Vietnam in the 1950s, they scheduled an election to be held shortly after. It became increasingly clear that the communist revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh would win it in a landslide.

So the U.S. intervened and installed Ngo Dinh Diem as leader of a new country it recognized as South Vietnam.

.Afghanistan

The election in 2014 didn’t go as the U.S. intended (like the one in 2009, shot through with fraud that gave it to Hamid Karzai). So the U.S. declared it a tie and created a new position not in the Afghan constitution called Chief Executive Officer.

Which we guess is better than assassinating the other guy.

When the CIA pressed President Barack Obama on its plan to arm “moderate” rebels working to oust Bashar Assad in Syria, he asked a provocative question: Has this kind of thing ever worked? An assessment was done, but if the agency found any examples, none have ever surfaced.

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-us-has-been-meddling-in-other-countries-elections-for-a-century-it-doesnt-feel-good_us_57983b85e4b02d5d5ed382bd

===============================================================

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INFORMATIVO PACIFICA MIERCOLES 28 DIC 2016

ESCUCHAR EL NOTICIERO AQUI:

(*) El congreso de Colombia aprueba la ley de amnistía que indulta a miles de guerrilleros que dejaran las armas.

(*) Hasta 200 mil personas se han apuntado para participar en la marcha de Mujeres en protesta por la inauguración de Donald Trump como presidente de Estados Unidos.

(*)  En España presionan al gobierno alemán para que obligue a una de sus empresas a pagar compensación a personas españolas afectadas con sus drogas.

(*) En Argentina, un tribunal ordena tres años de sentencia contra la activista indígena Milagro Sala por supuestamente instigar una protesta.

CIA Chief Admits the Agency’s Role in the Syrian War

El Director de la CIA admite el papel de la agencia en la guerra de Siria

 

By/Por: Paul Antonopoulos

December 26, 2016 “Information Clearing House” –

– “AMN“The head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Director of John Brennan said in an interview with National Public Radio (NPR) the the bloodshed in Syria was partially because of their role in the war.

“I think we always like to say that we wish that we would have been able to make a difference, in a way that would have prevented the slide and the situation there,” Director of John Brennan said in an interview with National Public Radio (NPR).

El Director de la Agencia Central de inteligencia (CIA), John Brennan, dijo en una entrevista con la Radio Pública Nacional  que el derramamiento de sangre en Siria fue en parte debido a su papel en la guerra.

“Creo que siempre nos gusta decir que deseamos que hubiéramos podido hacer una diferencia, de una forma que habría evitado el deslizamiento y la situación allí,” acoto Brennan.

“There’s no way you can divorce yourself, emotionally or mentally, from these situations that you play a role in,” Brennan said, adding that he “felt some responsibility for the horrific bloodshed” in the Syria war.

He then went onto predict that the terrorist forces loss in Aleppo will not end the war in Syria.

“This insurgency is not going to go away until there is some type of viable and genuine political process that will bring to power in Damascus a government that is representative of the Syrian people,” he further stated.

“No hay ninguna manera que uno puede separarse, emocional o mentalmente, de estas situaciones en las que uno juega un papel ” Brennan dijo, agregando que “sentía alguna responsabilidad por el horrible derramamiento de sangre” en la guerra de Siria.

Añadió que la derrota que sufrieran las fuerzas terroristas en Alepo no pondrá fin a la guerra en Siria.

“Esta insurgencia no va a quitar el dedo del renglón hasta que haya algún tipo de proceso político viable y genuino que lleve al poder en Damasco a un gobierno representativo del pueblo sirio”, indicó.

He then went onto admit that the USA has had little influence in being able to shape events in Syria.

“As great a country — as powerful a country — as the United States is, we have, in many areas, limited ability to influence the course of events,” Brennan said.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Information Clearing House editorial policy.

 Brennan admitió que los Estados Unidos han tenido poco éxito en sus intentos de influenciar en el acontecer en Siria.

A pesar de ser un gran país, un país tan poderoso — como es  Estados Unidos, hemos tenido en muchas áreas, limitada capacidad para influir en el curso de los acontecimientos” dijo Brennan.

Las opiniones expresadas en este artículo son del autor y no reflejan necesariamente la política editorial de Information Clearing House.

Paul Antonopoulos

@oulosP

Deputy-Editor at Al-Masdar News, Teacher at Charles Sturt Uni, Researcher at Western Sydney Uni. MA in International Relations. Regularly on PressTV and RT.

Source/fuente: http://www.microsofttranslator.com/bv.aspx?from=&to=es&a=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationclearinghouse.info%2F46107.htm